A deep-dive content audit across 64 Google quality signals — EEAT, YMYL, spam risk, content quality, and more — delivered as a clear, actionable CSV + PDF report.
A full breakdown across every dimension Google's Quality Rater Guidelines assess. Here's a real example output.
Overall Quality Score
ClearDesk SEO Summary
This health & wellness article demonstrates solid authoritativeness through a linked author bio with RD credentials, but falls short of YMYL standards due to missing outbound citations to peer-reviewed sources. The page quality is Medium+ — it would need higher expertise signals and verifiable accuracy evidence to reach High or Highest on YMYL topics. Priority action: Add citations, link to authoritative sources (Mayo Clinic, NIH), and add a "medically reviewed by" disclosure.
Key Flags
EEAT Breakdown — Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trust
Content Quality Analysis
Main Content Assessment
The main content is well-organized with clear headings, original phrasing, and appropriate reading level. What's missing: depth signals typical for YMYL health queries — this article covers the topic at surface level where Google's quality raters will expect supporting evidence, clinical references, and clearly cited sources. Expanding to 1,800–2,400 words with inline citations would materially raise the Page Quality rating.
Trust Assessment
Creator Profile
Author Sarah L., RD has a linked bio with visible credentials (Registered Dietitian, 12 years' practice, university affiliation). Bio includes a professional headshot, two external authoritative links, and a summary of clinical focus. Strength: one of the clearest authorship signals in the audited set. Gap: author is not cited elsewhere on authoritative medical publications — external verification would further strengthen expertise signals.
Spam Analysis
Deception & Ads Analysis
Priority Recommendations
A real-world comparison of Charlotte's Web, Cornbread Hemp, and CBDfx UK — scored with the same 64-signal audit you'll receive in your report. See how EEAT, YMYL, spam risk, and content quality differ across three established players in one of Google's most scrutinized industries.
Key findings: 30 spam-flagged pages on CBDfx · Charlotte's Web leads EEAT at 82 · Cornbread's lean 102-page site had the highest rank-ready ratio at 83%.
Read Full Case Study →We analyze every major dimension Google's quality raters and systems use to evaluate content.
Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness — the framework Google quality raters follow for every page.
Your Money or Your Life content is held to a higher standard. We flag pages where weak EEAT can cause significant ranking harm.
Thin, manipulative, or low-quality content patterns that trigger Google's spam detection systems and manual actions.
Page-level analysis of depth, freshness, structure, and readability — the signals that separate genuinely helpful content from filler.
On-page technical signals that affect how Google crawls, indexes, and ranks your content alongside the quality factors.
No plugin to install, no access required. Just tell us your URL and we'll handle the rest.
Pay once via secure checkout. Enter your website URL or any specific URL you want prioritized.
Our system crawls up to 500 URLs and runs each through 64 quality signal checks. No access needed from you.
Immediately receive a CSV + PDF of raw data — organized by URLs crawled.
Each issue includes a plain-English explanation and recommended fix. 30 days of email support is included.
No subscriptions, no upsells. Pay once and get everything you need to understand your site's content quality.
Secure checkout powered by Stripe. Questions? Contact us before ordering.
ClearDesk SEO was built by SEO professionals who were tired of switching between a dozen tools to understand why a site wasn't ranking. We started with a dashboard that lets you audit and fix SEO issues without leaving — and now we're bringing the same no-nonsense analysis to a standalone report product.
We don't sell vanity metrics or vague scores. Every signal in our report is tied to documented Google guidance — Quality Rater Guidelines, Developer Documentation, and observable ranking patterns from thousands of site audits.